This page contains articles written by readers of this site.
All submissions are reviewed for accuracy, and the editor reserves the right to omit any inappropriate material.
Submissions must not contain any copyrighted content and credit must be given to all sources used.
All material will be posted anonymously.
Ideas from McCain's Jewish Coalition at the RNC: I sat with a politically-active friend yesterday who told me that over recent days on 3 separate occasions he approached 3 separate hard-core Obama supporters (people of color, to boot) and asked them if they knew about George Obama [bro], whereupon they replied "no," whereupon he showed them a photo of the unfortunate George in front of his hut in Kenya and revealed that Obama has not supported his own brother. Stunningly to me, these 3 Obama-niks changed their view on the spot - and soured about Obama. ACTION ITEM: I am not sharing this with you in order to shoot the breeze, but in order that you share with the powers-that-be at campaign HQ that, perhaps, they put together another infomercial with this as the theme. In fact, to make things easier for HQ, I will now take the liberty of proposing content. Here goes: Slide 1 -- Did you know that Barack Obama says that he plans to feed, clothe, heal, and give hope to poor people all over the world? [photo of Obama making a speech...] Slide 2 -- If Obama gets his way, guess who will pay for his plan? [photo of a cash register] Slide 3 -- You! The American taxpayer. You will pay to feed, clothe, heal, and give hope to poor people all over the world. [photo of someone holding out empty pockets] Slide 4 -- If you will ask, "What track-record does Obama have at feeding, clothing, healing, and giving hope to poor people all over the world?" [photo of someone shrugging shoulders] Slide 5 -- Just ask Barack Obama's half-brother, George Hussein Obama, who lives in a hut in Kenya and subsists on less than $1 per month. [now-famous image of GHB standing in front of his hut] Slide 6 -- Senator Obama, rather than your making flowery speeches about how you want the American people to give hand-outs to poor people around the world, maybe it's time that you offer a hand-up from your own pocket to your own brother. Obama Endorsed an Anti-Semitic Hate Group, Solicited Another’s Endorsement Endorsed by Obama: “He’s one of the greedy Jew bastards killing our [black] people. Don’t give the Jew a dime.” Ready-to-go viral E-mail and blog entry: please copy, paste, and circulate as widely as possible. Unlike the smears and urban legends that are being directed against both Presidential tickets, the reader can verify the following material independently. Keep [going] right on past Freddy’s, he’s one of the greedy Jew bastards killing our [black] people. Don’t give the Jew a dime. The above anti-Semitic tirade came from Morris Powell, the head of Al Sharpton’s “Buy Black” Committee, during a menacing protest against a Jewish owned store, Freddy’s Fashion Mart, in 1995. In 2007, Barack Hussein Obama endorsed Al Sharpton and his National Action Network, the same hate group that shouted this and other epithets at a Jewish owned store, as follows: “Reverend Sharpton is a voice for the voiceless, and a voice for the dispossessed. What National Action Network has done is so important to change America, and it must be changed from the bottom up.” The reader can find this quote at Al Sharpton’s own Web site,http://www.nationalactionnetwork.net/html/press_releases.html; as we promised, the reader can verify every single statement we make here. Per Discover the Networks (http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1527), …Sharpton led his National Action Network in an ugly boycott against Freddy’s Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem, New York. …The street leader of the boycott, Morris Powell, was the head of Sharpton’s “Buy Black” Committee. Repeatedly referring to the Jewish proprietors of Freddy’s as “crackers,” Powell and his fellow protesters menacingly told passersby, “Keep [going] right on past Freddy’s, he’s one of the greedy Jew bastards killing our [black] people. Don’t give the Jew a dime.” Some picketers openly threatened violence against whites and Jews — all under the watchful, approving eye of Sharpton. The subsequent picketing became increasingly menacing in its tone until one of the protesters eventually shot four whites in the store and then set the building on fire — killing seven employees, most of whom were Hispanics. The following additional information is from the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal (http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110004192). Democrats Embrace ‘Impresario of Hatred,’ by Fred Siegel, 2/29/2000 It would have taken no great effort for the reporters covering the Apollo debate to have walked across 125th Street from the theater to visit Freddy’s Fashion Mart, where in 1995 eight people died in a murderous rampage inspired by Mr. Sharpton. …Picketers from Mr. Sharpton’s National Action Network, sometimes joined by “the Rev.” himself, marched daily outside the store, screaming about “bloodsucking Jews” and “Jew bastards” and threatening to burn the building down. After weeks of increasingly violent rhetoric, one of the protesters, Roland Smith, took Mr. Sharpton’s words about ousting the “white interloper” to heart. He ran into the store shouting, “It’s on!” He shot and wounded three whites and a Pakistani, whom he apparently mistook for a Jew. Then he set the fire, which killed five Hispanics, one Guyanese and one African-American–a security guard whom protesters had taunted as a “cracker lover.” Smith then fatally shot himself. And what did Barry Hussein Obama have to say about this very same racist and anti-Semitic hate group and its leader, under whose personal supervision much of the above activity took place? “Reverend Sharpton is a voice for the voiceless, and a voice for the dispossessed. What National Action Network has done is so important to change America, and it must be changed from the bottom up.” Perhaps Barry’s perception of “change” includes burning white and Jewish-owned stores in the “wrong” neighborhoods, much as the Klan once treated Black homes and businesses in white neighborhoods. Al Sharpton: The Democrat’s David Duke by Jeff Jacoby (http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=2411) adds that Morris Powell also said of Freddy’s owner, “We’re going to see that this cracker suffers,” and that the National Action Network–the same organization that Obama endorsed–shouted “Burn down the Jew store!” Furthermore, 1991: A Hasidic Jewish driver in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights section accidentally kills Gavin Cato, a 7-year-old black child, and antisemitic riots erupt. Sharpton races to pour gasoline on the fire. At Gavin’s funeral he rails against the “diamond merchants” — code for Jews — with “the blood of innocent babies” on their hands. He mobilizes hundreds of demonstrators to march through the Jewish neighborhood, chanting, “No justice, no peace.” A rabbinical student, Yankel Rosenbaum, is surrounded by a mob shouting “Kill the Jews!” and stabbed to death. “Power Dem” by Jay Nordlinger (http://www.nationalreview.com/20Mar00/nordlinger032000.html) expands on this as follows. The following is directly from Al Sharpton, Barry Hussein Obama’s “voice for the voiceless.” The world will tell us that [Gavin Cato] was killed by accident. . . . What type of city do we have that would allow politics to rise above the blood of innocent babies? . . . Talk about how Oppenheimer in South Africa sends diamonds straight to Tel Aviv and deals with the diamond merchants right here in Crown Heights. …If the Jews want to get it on, tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house.” We encourage our Jewish readers to take Sharpton up on this on November 4, and send his friend and enabler Barry back to Illinois with a humiliating landslide defeat. See also Dr. Gerhard Falk’s “The New York Pogrom Case” at http://www.jbuff.com/c012402.htm. As we promised, the reader can verify independently that Al Sharpton has a long track record of inciting hatred of white people and especially Jews. A Google search on “Sharpton” and any of the following phrases will provide links, not to “someone’s blog,” but to identifiable sources including the Wall Street Journal, as cited above: “Tawana Brawley,” “Yankel Rosenbaum,” “Crown Heights,” and “Freddy’s Fashion Mart.” “Jew Lieberman Done, Corporate Clinton Next.” So said an entry on MoveOn.org’s now disgraced Action Forum. Barack Obama solicited this organization’s support, and he accepted it as shown at http://moveon.org/press/pr/obamaendorsementrelease.html. MoveOn.org’s Action Forum was one of that organization’s most prized organizing tools until the public discovered that it contained reams of anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, and other forms of hate speech as well as 9/11 conspiracy theories that blamed the U.S. Government and/or Jews for the worst crime that has ever been perpetrated against this country. Eli Pariser, the same individual who sanctioned the publication of a defamatory insult to General David Petraeus (”General Betray Us,”https://pol.moveon.org/petraeus.html) tried to excuse the hate speech as follows. MoveOn’s ActionForum is an open forum where members of the public and MoveOn members can post their thoughts regarding important political issues. Once in a while—as in any public forum—inappropriate material is posted. Recently, a few of the thousands of comments that are posted every week contained anti-Semitic language. (1) It wasn’t just “a few” comments, it was literally dozens, and this does not include the racist, anti-Catholic, or anti-Evangelical hate speech either. (2) It wasn’t just “recent.” Some of the hate speech had been online for months if not more. The comments that were posted were abhorrent. We were dismayed to see them, and removed them as soon as they came to our attention 17 days ago. (1) The Action Forum’s own FAQ page (http://www.actionforum.com/general/faq.html#1, online as of 9/21/08) says that the moderators read each entry twice, which means that the moderators saw them and did nothing about them until they became a public scandal–much like the hate speech that pervades Barack Obama’s own campaign site at my.barackobama.com. (2) An enormous collection of hate speech–enough to fill three large Web pages–was harvested from the Action Forum two or more weeks after Eli Pariser said it was removed. A few examples appear below, and all were harvested after Pariser made the above statement. Many of the comments identified were not, in fact, made by MoveOn members. How do you know, Eli? We are working to discern whether they were made as a part of a right-wing campaign to target the organization. This is about as believable as, “The cops planted the weed on me, man” when the speaker has two “Mary Jane” cigarettes hanging from his mouth. Clearly, any attempt to tie MoveOn’s 3.2 million members to the hateful comments of a few nonmembers on an online public forum is wrong. Again, how does Pariser know they were nonmembers? Again, it wasn’t just “a few,” it was dozens. We were pleased to see that so many MoveOn members rose to sharply criticize the hate speech that was posted – even before it was brought to our attention.” As shown by the overwhelming votes of approval for the hate speech, which we have included in the quotes below, the opposite is true–as with a lot of what Eli Pariser says. Remember, this is the same individual who sanctioned the publication of a defamatory insult to a four-star general, and Barack Obama’s spittle joined Pariser’s on this officer’s uniform and service ribbons when he accepted MoveOn’s endorsement. In addition, we encourage the reader to do a Google image search on “MoveOn.org” and “Pope Benedict” to see MoveOn.org’s derogatory photo-manipulation that shows the Pope waving a gavel in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. This also was on Eli Pariser’s watch, and it doubtlessly had his approval. Now, this is the kind of material that MoveOn.org welcomed to a Web site over which it exercised editorial control. All was downloaded after Eli Pariser said it had been removed, and we have included the votes from other MoveOn Action Forum participants. We need your help in finding a word that is less offensive [than "Jew Lieberman"]. One that describes the Jewish congressmen and Jewish owned media that has a greater allegiance to Israel than the US. And who are demonizing Israel’s neighbors and supporting Israel’s bombing and occupation. Read “Israeli Lobby” google it. 7 of 8 voted to AGREE with this It is a matter of record that a moderator at Obama for America, Emily (they give only their first names) counseled a user to write “Israel Lobby” instead of “Jewish Lobby” in his blog postings. Google on “emily,” “obama for america” and “israel lobby” to learn more. We can all see how AIPAC/Israel has taken control of America. Not to get nasty but jews have a long history of subverting governments for their own enrichment and glory to the detriment of whole societies. Many more than “6 million” have died by semetic aggression, 100’s of millions even, remember the conqueror writes history. Even the roman empire feared jewish power. Over and over again, whites, particularly semites have distorted truth through their supremacist, zenophobic minds. Ariel Sharon Oct of 2001 per Kol Israel, “… Don’t worry about america, we control america and the americans know it.” There is a mental pathology gripping my tribe, as the native americans say, “white man have forked tongue”, we must become enlightened, or we will be destroyed. 13 of 16 voted to AGREE with this Another posting contained an actual blood libel of Jews, and ten out of thirteen Action Forum participants voted to agree with it. This is but an excerpt. Today in Israel, school curricula are dominated by the Talmud, especially a specific Talmudic text called Shulhan Aruch. In this text, Jews are commanded to slaughter non-Jews who are viewed more or less as animals or at least lesser human beings. Another MoveOn.org Action Forum posting, with which 13 out of 16 readers agreed, said that Zionism is racism. Eight out of eight, meanwhile, agreed with the following: Another neo-con appeared today on C-Span to defend Bush and his spying program! I am Jewish and proud of it (despite everything) but I am sick of seeing those neo-cons posing as average joes on national television to defend Bush and his lies. Since they don’t have the decency or honesty to identify themselves by saying: “But you know, I am a Zionist and may be biased” and since most Americans can’t tell the difference and don’t have the courage to ask, maybe they should be forced to wear an Israeli flag on the lapel of their jackets. Isn’t it time to tell the American people the truth, i.e. that Jews control all the media. Barack Obama solicited and accepted this organization’s endorsement, thus enabling and empowering anti-Semites. Barack Obama endorsed and praised Al Sharpton and his National Action Network, thus enabling and empowering more racists and anti-Semites. This shows that Barack Obama’s politics have not changed since his college days as described in “Dreams From My Father” and, unlike the smears and urban legends, we will give a page number: page 101 of the paperback version, ISBN 978-1-4000-8277-3.
After all, there were thousands of so-called campus radicals, most of them white and tenured and happily tolerated. No, it remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.
Maybe Barack Hussein Obama consorts openly with, praises, and endorses racists because he is one, and the reader can form his or her own conclusion from his empowerment and open endorsement of anti-Semites.
A message from Jonathan Garthwaite, Editor-in-Chief, Townhall.comFriends,Emperor Obama has spoken.In a manner fit for an Emperor, Obama descended upon the more than 80,000 gathered in Denver to receive his message last night. I couldn't help but notice the similarities between the spectacle and the man himself. While the Roman columns looked the part, Invesco field was no more a Roman Coliseum then Barack Obama is qualified to be President of the United States. Even with Joe Biden by his side, Roman pillars surrounding him and Bill and Hillary behind him, the Barack Obama last night at Mile High was the same inexperienced, liberal radical we have always known him to be. No amount of rock concert lighting, Broadway stagecraft, lofty rhetoric -- or even fireworks -- will change that. The media networks in attendance may trust him to lead them to the Promised Land, but we certainly do not. Americans need to stand up now and show our opposition to the radical left agenda that a President Obama would impose on us. Now is the time for us to stand up to the New York Times and their liberal media cronies and show our opposition to Obama. Join the NObama revolution. When you order your NOBAMA kit you will receive a years subscription of Townhall Magazine. Your first issue includes a special feature we commissioned that looks into what America could look like after a year of an Obama presidency ... it could be called "Obamageddon." The year is 2011 and bestselling writer Douglas Mackinnon takes us into the halls of power as several of the nation's greatest military minds gather to find a solution to the tragic mess our national security has become. This issue is a must read for any conservative that is concerned about our national security at home and abroad. Our cover story is an in-depth report you won't find on the Internet. Our reporter went to the border and interviewed families living on the border and have their remarkable stories ... these landowners truly are our last line of defense. After reading this report you will know what it is like to be and American standing at the border defending our nation. In addition Obamageddon, the September issue includes our very special immigration expose. Life On The Border takes us to the border to hear the stories of the hard-working American landowners who live in a zone of danger and destruction as illegal aliens -- coming across the border -- streaming across their property. The September issue features Amanda Carpenter examining the failures of government & teacher run schools, Fred Thompson tells you what you need to know about the housing crisis, plus Michelle Malkin, Mary Katharine Ham, an interview with Kathleen Parker and plenty of compelling photography, analysis, humor and wit. Act now to place the NOBAMA yard sign in front of your home and arm yourself with this important information about our border, the housing crisis and the dangers of an Obama presidency. The following are conclusions drawn by Dr. Michael Oren after studying the public statements of the two candidates, Democrat Sen. Barack Obama and Republican Sen. John McCain, about their positions on Israel and the Middle East, as related in a briefing at MediaCentral in Jerusalem on July 21, 2008:
Obama: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the core regional problem. If it can be dealt with, others can be tackled. McCain: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict cannot be dealt with until the core problem of Islamic radicalism - especially supported by Iran - is dealt with. Problems presented by Iran , Hizbullah and Hamas must be addressed before an effective start to the peace process can be made.
Obama: Says he will be more hands-on with peace process than President Bush was in his first seven years in office. Based on Obama's statements, Dr Oren's believes Obama would support a regional process, perhaps taking in Syria and other actors. Oren believes Obama will take Palestinian claims to east Jerusalem into greater consideration than McCain and would be more likely to pressure Israel over settlements. Oren believes that Obama would be more likely to deal with a PA that incorporated Hamas after unity talks. Obama has also spoken about "territorial contiguity" for the Palestinians, which implies some kind of road between Gaza and Judea Samaria that is not under Israeli control. McCain: Also says he will be more hands on. Based on his statements, Oren believes McCain would support a process focusing narrowly on Israeli-Palestinian issues, not making it regional unless Syria stopped supporting Hizbollah and stopped terrorists from crossing the Syrian border into Iraq . Oren believes McCain would be more sympathetic to Israel over settlements, less likely to pressure Israel over Jerusalem , and less likely to deal with a PA containing Hamas. McCain did not meet with the PA or Palestinian leaders when he visited Israel . According to Oren, McCain has said that the PA is responsible for terror emanating from its territory and that Palestinian leaders and society must fight terror; according to Oren, Obama has not said this.
Both Obama and McCain have signed on to the Quartet's 3 conditions for Hamas being a peace partner: 1) recognition of Israel ; 2) eschewing terror; 3) abiding by all previous PA agreements. Obama: Praised the recent cease fire between Israel & Hamas. Obama only expressed his reservations about former US President Jimmy Carter's trip to the Middle East and meeting with the Hamas leadership in Damascus after being condemned for not doing so by McCain. McCain: Expressed reservations about the cease fire and was quick to condemn Carter's meetings.
Obama: Retracted his statements about an undivided city as eternal capital of Israel , saying instead that there shouldn't be any barbed wire in the city. McCain: Called for the US embassy to be moved to Jerusalem .
Obama: More in favor of opening dialogue with Iran with few preconditions. He has said that all options were on the table for dealing with Iran 's nuclear program, but he has not explicitly mentioned a military option. He has called Iran a threat, and has said that Iran is not a threat. Obama criticized the Kyl-Lieberman amendment, an amendment calling for Iran 's republican guard to be designated a terrorist group, as saber rattling. He also praised the NIE report that said Iran had suspended their enrichment program McCain: McCain will not talk to Iran unless Tehran stops supporting terror and talking about wiping Israel off the map. He has talked about a military option, but favors more stringent sanctions before that it is considered. McCain supported the Kyl-Lieberman amendment. After the NIE report he said "the intelligence agencies aren't going to make my policies."
Obama: A more Clintonesque approach. Obama would treat terror as lest of a strategic issue and more of a legislative one. He would counter it with the FBI and police, rather than the army. McCain: Continue the Bush approach, using extra-constitutional means to pursue and fight terrorists and prosecute the war on terror.
Obama: The war in Iraq is a distraction from the war on terror. He supports a phased16-month withdrawal with no permanent US bases in Iraq . He would leave just a small force to guard the embassy, train troops and be a rapid response team to Al Qaeda. McCain: The war in Iraq is an integral part of the war on terror. He believes the surge has been a success, and once said that he saw 2013 as the earliest withdrawal time.
Obama: Has publicly discussed his reservations about the Likud party McCain: Has stayed out of domestic Israeli politics.
Obama’s Presidential Seal Not Illegal, Just Dishonest and Unethical The actual misuse of the seal of a U.S. government agency to imply endorsement by said agency is a criminal violation of the U.S. Code. Since Obama modified the seal, he did not actually do anything illegal, but the use of a device similar to the Great Seal reflects on his character and ethics. He is obviously trying to convey the image that he is really the President. |